To begin with, I consider all people who had commited crimes must be punished. It's an anacceptable actions that create threat for society.
As for me, crimes can be unserious or non-threatening for people around. In that case, perpetrator shouldn't be imprisoned. But sometimes person's offence can be dangerous for surrounding people or, unluckily, lead to terrible consequences. At this point, that criminal must be imprisoned due to his misconduct.
As I have said earlier, thats all depends on complexity of crimes. So I assume, person who commit less violent crime should be forced to do public services and not be imprisoned, only If that person is aware of their fault and can clearly understand all the horrible implications they can result in.
To sum up, I can't claim that each person with less violent crimes shouldn't be imprisoned, because dofferent cases cause different sentence.
Відповідь:
To begin with, I consider all people who had commited crimes must be punished. It's an anacceptable actions that create threat for society.
As for me, crimes can be unserious or non-threatening for people around. In that case, perpetrator shouldn't be imprisoned. But sometimes person's offence can be dangerous for surrounding people or, unluckily, lead to terrible consequences. At this point, that criminal must be imprisoned due to his misconduct.
As I have said earlier, thats all depends on complexity of crimes. So I assume, person who commit less violent crime should be forced to do public services and not be imprisoned, only If that person is aware of their fault and can clearly understand all the horrible implications they can result in.
To sum up, I can't claim that each person with less violent crimes shouldn't be imprisoned, because dofferent cases cause different sentence.
Пояснення: